Tencent / RapidJSON C++

RapidJSON是一个C++的JSON解析器及生成器

腾讯 c++ json
拷贝地址

项目最近一次提交:2 个月 前 a38104a16

No_avatar shadeware fix typos in doc code 2017-03-19 03:03:36
文件 238行 9.8 KB

Schema

(This feature was released in v1.1.0)

JSON Schema is a draft standard for describing the format of JSON data. The schema itself is also JSON data. By validating a JSON structure with JSON Schema, your code can safely access the DOM without manually checking types, or whether a key exists, etc. It can also ensure that the serialized JSON conform to a specified schema.

RapidJSON implemented a JSON Schema validator for JSON Schema Draft v4. If you are not familiar with JSON Schema, you may refer to Understanding JSON Schema.

[TOC]

Basic Usage

First of all, you need to parse a JSON Schema into Document, and then compile the Document into a SchemaDocument.

Secondly, construct a SchemaValidator with the SchemaDocument. It is similar to a Writer in the sense of handling SAX events. So, you can use document.Accept(validator) to validate a document, and then check the validity.

#include "rapidjson/schema.h"

// ...

Document sd;
if (sd.Parse(schemaJson).HasParseError()) {
    // the schema is not a valid JSON.
    // ...       
}
SchemaDocument schema(sd); // Compile a Document to SchemaDocument
// sd is no longer needed here.

Document d;
if (d.Parse(inputJson).HasParseError()) {
    // the input is not a valid JSON.
    // ...       
}

SchemaValidator validator(schema);
if (!d.Accept(validator)) {
    // Input JSON is invalid according to the schema
    // Output diagnostic information
    StringBuffer sb;
    validator.GetInvalidSchemaPointer().StringifyUriFragment(sb);
    printf("Invalid schema: %s\n", sb.GetString());
    printf("Invalid keyword: %s\n", validator.GetInvalidSchemaKeyword());
    sb.Clear();
    validator.GetInvalidDocumentPointer().StringifyUriFragment(sb);
    printf("Invalid document: %s\n", sb.GetString());
}

Some notes:

  • One SchemaDocment can be referenced by multiple SchemaValidators. It will not be modified by SchemaValidators.
  • A SchemaValidator may be reused to validate multiple documents. To run it for other documents, call validator.Reset() first.

Validation during parsing/serialization

Unlike most JSON Schema validator implementations, RapidJSON provides a SAX-based schema validator. Therefore, you can parse a JSON from a stream while validating it on the fly. If the validator encounters a JSON value that invalidates the supplied schema, the parsing will be terminated immediately. This design is especially useful for parsing large JSON files.

DOM parsing

For using DOM in parsing, Document needs some preparation and finalizing tasks, in addition to receiving SAX events, thus it needs some work to route the reader, validator and the document. SchemaValidatingReader is a helper class that doing such work.

#include "rapidjson/filereadstream.h"

// ...
SchemaDocument schema(sd); // Compile a Document to SchemaDocument

// Use reader to parse the JSON
FILE* fp = fopen("big.json", "r");
FileReadStream is(fp, buffer, sizeof(buffer));

// Parse JSON from reader, validate the SAX events, and store in d.
Document d;
SchemaValidatingReader<kParseDefaultFlags, FileReadStream, UTF8<> > reader(is, schema);
d.Populate(reader);

if (!reader.GetParseResult()) {
    // Not a valid JSON
    // When reader.GetParseResult().Code() == kParseErrorTermination,
    // it may be terminated by:
    // (1) the validator found that the JSON is invalid according to schema; or
    // (2) the input stream has I/O error.

    // Check the validation result
    if (!reader.IsValid()) {
        // Input JSON is invalid according to the schema
        // Output diagnostic information
        StringBuffer sb;
        reader.GetInvalidSchemaPointer().StringifyUriFragment(sb);
        printf("Invalid schema: %s\n", sb.GetString());
        printf("Invalid keyword: %s\n", reader.GetInvalidSchemaKeyword());
        sb.Clear();
        reader.GetInvalidDocumentPointer().StringifyUriFragment(sb);
        printf("Invalid document: %s\n", sb.GetString());
    }
}

SAX parsing

For using SAX in parsing, it is much simpler. If it only need to validate the JSON without further processing, it is simply:

SchemaValidator validator(schema);
Reader reader;
if (!reader.Parse(stream, validator)) {
    if (!validator.IsValid()) {
        // ...    
    }
}

This is exactly the method used in the schemavalidator example. The distinct advantage is low memory usage, no matter how big the JSON was (the memory usage depends on the complexity of the schema).

If you need to handle the SAX events further, then you need to use the template class GenericSchemaValidator to set the output handler of the validator:

MyHandler handler;
GenericSchemaValidator<SchemaDocument, MyHandler> validator(schema, handler);
Reader reader;
if (!reader.Parse(ss, validator)) {
    if (!validator.IsValid()) {
        // ...    
    }
}

Serialization

It is also possible to do validation during serializing. This can ensure the result JSON is valid according to the JSON schema.

StringBuffer sb;
Writer<StringBuffer> writer(sb);
GenericSchemaValidator<SchemaDocument, Writer<StringBuffer> > validator(s, writer);
if (!d.Accept(validator)) {
    // Some problem during Accept(), it may be validation or encoding issues.
    if (!validator.IsValid()) {
        // ...
    }
}

Of course, if your application only needs SAX-style serialization, it can simply send SAX events to SchemaValidator instead of Writer.

Remote Schema

JSON Schema supports {gfm-extraction-055b2ecedbaf6e5f0fe7bf556573de00} keyword, which is a JSON pointer referencing to a local or remote schema. Local pointer is prefixed with #, while remote pointer is an relative or absolute URI. For example:

{ "$ref": "definitions.json#/address" }

As SchemaDocument does not know how to resolve such URI, it needs a user-provided IRemoteSchemaDocumentProvider instance to do so.

class MyRemoteSchemaDocumentProvider : public IRemoteSchemaDocumentProvider {
public:
    virtual const SchemaDocument* GetRemoteDocument(const char* uri, SizeType length) {
        // Resolve the uri and returns a pointer to that schema.
    }
};

// ...

MyRemoteSchemaDocumentProvider provider;
SchemaDocument schema(sd, &provider);

Conformance

RapidJSON passed 262 out of 263 tests in JSON Schema Test Suite (Json Schema draft 4).

The failed test is "changed scope ref invalid" of "change resolution scope" in refRemote.json. It is due to that id schema keyword and URI combining function are not implemented.

Besides, the format schema keyword for string values is ignored, since it is not required by the specification.

Regular Expression

The schema keyword pattern and patternProperties uses regular expression to match the required pattern.

RapidJSON implemented a simple NFA regular expression engine, which is used by default. It supports the following syntax.

Syntax Description
ab Concatenation
a|b Alternation
a? Zero or one
a* Zero or more
a+ One or more
a{3} Exactly 3 times
a{3,} At least 3 times
a{3,5} 3 to 5 times
(ab) Grouping
^a At the beginning
a$ At the end
. Any character
[abc] Character classes
[a-c] Character class range
[a-z0-9_] Character class combination
[^abc] Negated character classes
[^a-c] Negated character class range
[\b] Backspace (U+0008)
\|, \\, ... Escape characters
\f Form feed (U+000C)
\n Line feed (U+000A)
\r Carriage return (U+000D)
\t Tab (U+0009)
\v Vertical tab (U+000B)

For C++11 compiler, it is also possible to use the std::regex by defining RAPIDJSON_SCHEMA_USE_INTERNALREGEX=0 and RAPIDJSON_SCHEMA_USE_STDREGEX=1. If your schemas do not need pattern and patternProperties, you can set both macros to zero to disable this feature, which will reduce some code size.

Performance

Most C++ JSON libraries do not yet support JSON Schema. So we tried to evaluate the performance of RapidJSON's JSON Schema validator according to json-schema-benchmark, which tests 11 JavaScript libraries running on Node.js.

That benchmark runs validations on JSON Schema Test Suite, in which some test suites and tests are excluded. We made the same benchmarking procedure in {gfm-extraction-7140babdd5f40df8e16553c3f2d075c7}.

On a Mac Book Pro (2.8 GHz Intel Core i7), the following results are collected.

Validator Relative speed Number of test runs per second
RapidJSON 155% 30682
{gfm-extraction-7436293977d171a56773ddee38e253fe} 100% 19770 (± 1.31%)
{gfm-extraction-c92c71b16fa2845df1b930b8534d9149} 70% 13835 (± 2.84%)
{gfm-extraction-395b0500e4b9ff811c723b4bb9a42a64} 57.7% 11411 (± 1.27%)
{gfm-extraction-b9571de6bed28ddaaccdb3aad6e263e2} 26% 5145 (± 1.62%)
{gfm-extraction-2486613c161379adacaac72cb2a04ed4} 19.9% 3935 (± 2.69%)
{gfm-extraction-83c5e163180cd19dde7351ededd708b8} 7% 1388 (± 0.84%)
{gfm-extraction-f5129fba407f604e2596a089556e9e41} 3.1% 606 (± 2.84%)
{gfm-extraction-bf0b099b9c867efa0a3123c6b7d69718} 0.9% 185 (± 1.01%)
{gfm-extraction-08db33a7454ea162b2ed7fe33b04f769} 0.8% 154 (± 0.79%)
tv4 0.5% 93 (± 0.94%)
{gfm-extraction-854c10b54913e07a7108f569a28f7a59} 0.1% 21 (± 1.14%)

That is, RapidJSON is about 1.5x faster than the fastest JavaScript library (ajv). And 1400x faster than the slowest one.